This changes the implementation of $display/$write to use VHDL
report statements rather the the std.textio functions. The code
produced is simpler and more like what a real VHDL designed would
write. However it no longer exactly matches the Verilog output as
most VHDL simulators prepend the text with simulation time, entity
name, severity level, etc. There is a corresponding change in
ivtest to support this.
Conflicts:
tgt-vhdl/cast.cc
tgt-vhdl/display.cc
tgt-vhdl/vhdl_syntax.cc
tgt-vhdl/vhdl_target.h
Previous we generated a "wait for 0 ns" statement after
every blocking assignment that wasn't the last statement
in the process. While this implements the Verilog semantics,
it generates excessive waits, and cannot usually be synthesised.
This patch only generates "wait for 0 ns" statements when it
cannot be avoid (e.g. when the target of a blocking assignment
is read in the same process).
An example:
begin
x = 5;
if (x == 2)
y = 7;
end
Becomes:
x <= 5;
wait for 0 ns; -- Required to implement assignment semantics
if x = 2 then
y <= 7; -- No need for wait here, not read
-- wait for 0 ns (previously)
end if;
Conflicts:
tgt-vhdl/process.cc
tgt-vhdl/stmt.cc
tgt-vhdl/vhdl_target.h
This changes the implementation of $display/$write to use VHDL
report statements rather the the std.textio functions. The code
produced is simpler and more like what a real VHDL designed would
write. However it no longer exactly matches the Verilog output as
most VHDL simulators prepend the text with simulation time, entity
name, severity level, etc. There is a corresponding change in
ivtest to support this.
Previous we generated a "wait for 0 ns" statement after
every blocking assignment that wasn't the last statement
in the process. While this implements the Verilog semantics,
it generates excessive waits, and cannot usually be synthesised.
This patch only generates "wait for 0 ns" statements when it
cannot be avoid (e.g. when the target of a blocking assignment
is read in the same process).
An example:
begin
x = 5;
if (x == 2)
y = 7;
end
Becomes:
x <= 5;
wait for 0 ns; -- Required to implement assignment semantics
if x = 2 then
y <= 7; -- No need for wait here, not read
-- wait for 0 ns (previously)
end if;
This patch adds code to generate process-local variables
for scopes of type IVL_SCT_BLOCK. This also handles using
the correct assignment operator (:=) for the local VHDL
variables.
I forgot to modify the LPM generating code with the
last patch. This *should* now always ensure a signal
is readable before code is generated to read from it.
This patch optimises away straight line sequences like:
wait for 0 ns;
wait for X ns;
to:
wait for X ns;
This tidies up the output a bit.
It also has the effect of removing all code from initial
processes where the assignments have been extracted as
VHDL signal intialisers. (c.f. pr2391337)
If the final statement in a process is a non-blocking
assignment then there is no point adding a `wait for 0ns'
after it since it will be immediately followed by another
wait. This case is suprisingly common, so this patch helps
generate much cleaner output without breaking the cases
where the 0ns wait is actually required (e.g. to implement
non-blocking assignment properly).
If output P of A is connected to output Q of B (and A is
instantiated inside B) then VHDL does not allow B to read
the value of Q (also P), but Verilog does. To get around
this the output Q is mapped to P_Sig which is then connected
to P, this allows B to read the value of P/Q via P_Sig.
Martin Whitaker
Nick Gasson
Stephen Williams
Cary R