The expressions of a contribution statement are real valued by
definition, but we need to do the width probing anyhow in order
to resolve types and the widths of subexpressions.
Get at least basic elaboration of analog processes and contribution
statements. Bring the statements and analog statements together and
net future elaboration work sort out which statements are valid in
a given context. This makes sense because there really is a lot of
syntactic overlap, and analog behavioral code is processed somewhat
sequentially.
Put together the infrastructure for elaborating analog statements,
including create the NetAnalogTop objects that hold analog statements
and are in turn held by the design.
While doing this, clean up the various unique initial/always enumerations
to use the ivl_process_type_t type.
Stephen Williams