Looks like I missed this in https://github.com/sbt/sbt/pull/6874 and I
hit on it in Mill when I couldn't figure out why it was also empty, and
thanks to @adpi realized it was because of the `LoggedReporter` in zinc
not taking it into account. However before I can bump that this needs to
be bumped as well.
refs: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/issues/14904
Looks like I missed this in https://github.com/sbt/sbt/pull/6874 and I
hit on it in Mill when I couldn't figure out why it was also empty, and
thanks to @adpi realized it was because of the `LoggedReporter` in zinc
not taking it into account. However before I can bump that this needs to
be bumped as well.
refs: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/issues/14904
If we use the ProxyTerminal in the background jobs, the logs
would be spread across different terminals, switching from active
client to active client. We want the logs to stick
to the client that started the job.
A new context is created and closed for each state of the MainLoop.
But the context of the backgroundJob must stay alive.
So we use a context that is owned by the BackgroundJobService.
It creates a new logger for each background job and cleans it when
the job stops.
Problem
-------
Console.systemOut is hooked up to Terminal.get, which internally calls
ProxyTerminal, which lets us deffer the wiring of terminal to
activeTerminal. This mechanism allows us to swap out the terminal
capable of standard out forwarding for sbtn.
However, as it stands this breaks the contract of being able to use
Console.systemOut with wrapped inside of `Terminal.withStreams() {...}`.
Solution
--------
Check if `activeTerminal.get` returns `null`, and if so initialize it to
the conventional `Terminal.SimpleTerminal`, which behaves as expected.
There are cases where sbt will incorrectly shutdown if the jline reader
is interrupted while filling the input buffer. To fix this we can throw
an InterruptedException instead of a ClosedException.
The repro for this was start `sbt`, input `~compile` and while sbt was
starting up, open a source file with vim using the metals bsp
integration. sbt server would end up shutting down everytime after a
single compilation iteration.
With the latest sbt code, the `last` command displayed all of the output
without line separators. This occurred because the logic for appending
bytes to System.out split the input bytes on the line separator but if
there was nothing but the line separator in the input bytes then the
result was empty.
When there are multiple console appenders for a logger, we inadvertently
evaluated the message thunk for each appender which would cause side
effects to be unexpectedely evaluated multiple times.
Fixes part of #6126.
In 85d17889b6, I attempted to fix
supershell messages getting interlaced with log lines. It turned out
that that approach didn't work with windows and was causing all of the
output to bet blown away. A better approach is to check if the bytes
we're writing contain one or more line separators. If so, we can wrap
the bytes in a string and split the string into lines. Then we can
append a ClearScreenAfterCursor before every newline.
I think the problem with windows was that the ClearScreenAfterCursor was
coming between the carraige return and the newline.
The boot server socket was not working correctly when the sbt server was
started by the thin client. This was because it is necessary for us to
create a ConsoleTerminal in order for System.out and System.err to be
properly forwarded to the clients connected over the boot server socket.
As a result, if you started a server instance of sbt with the thin
client, you wouldn't see any output util you connected to the server.
The fix is to just make sure that we create a console terminal if sbt is
run as a subprocess.
We no longer need to use the forked version of jline because they have
merged in our required changes. The latest version of jline does upgrade
jansi, however, and some of the apis we were relying on for windows were
removed so they had to be manually implemented. I verified that console
input still worked on my windows vm after this change.
In 3b09ff6af7, we stopped adding a clear
screen after curser after each log line. This inadvertently caused
supershell lines to get interlaced with log lines. This can be fixed by
writing a ClearScreenAfterCursor after every newline character that we
write to stdout.
As a bonus, I had also long noticed that supershell log lines would get
interlaced with the serverTestProj/test output and this change fixes
that as well.
On terminals with virtual io disabled, we'd spin up a thread for each
watch iteration that performed a blocking read from the terminal input
stream. This thread could not be joined which would cause the triggered
execution to be delayed by 1 second while sbt blocked trying to join
that thread. It also meant that input probably didn't work correctly
since the user would end up with many threads polling from system in.
The fix to this problem is to poll the terminal input stream if it is
unsafe to do a blocking read, which is the case for dumb terminals or if
virtual io is disabled.
With sbt 1.4.x, non-ascii utf-8 characters are not handled correctly in
the console. It was not clear from the jline 3 documentation but the
NonBlockingReader.read method is supposed to return unicode points
rather than utf8 bytes. To fix this, we can decode the input and return
the code point rather than the directy byte from the input stream.
When the sbt main loop is blocked by console, any other connected client
is prompted that they can kill the task by typing cancel. The
implementation for the console task is to write some input that will
cause the console to exit because the scala 2.12 console cannot be
safely killed with an interrupt. This input, however, was being blocked
from written to the console because the console input stream was holding
the readThread lock. We can be fix this and propagate the input to the
console we wish to terminate by synchronizing on a different lock
object. This should have no impact outside of cancelling the console
because that is the only place where we call the write method of
WriteableInputStream.