The figure_packed_base_type() method can be used to check whether a type is
2-state or 4-state at parse time. The parser no longer cares about the
specific type of a data type. The figure_packed_base_type() function is
no longer used, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When using non-ANSI style port declarations it is possible to declare the
port direction and the data type for the port in separate statements. E.g.
```
input x;
reg x;
```
When using packed array dimensions they must match for both declarations.
E.g.
```
input [3:0] x;
reg [3:0] x;
```
But this only applies for vector types, i.e. the packed dimension is
explicitly declared. It does not apply to the `integer` and `time` types,
which have an implicit packed dimension.
The current implementation requires that even for `integer` and `time`
types the implicit dimension needs to be explicitly declared in the port
direction. E.g. the following will result in a elaboration error
complaining about a packed dimension mismatch.
```
module test;
output x;
integer x;
endmodule
```
Currently the parser creates a vector_type_t for `time` and `integer`. This
means that e.g. `time` and `reg [63:0]` are indistinguishable during
elaboration, even though they require different behavior.
To fix let the atom2_type_t handle `integer` and `time`. Since it no longer
exclusively handles 2-state types, rename it to atom_type_t.
This also fixes a problem with the vlog95 target unit tests. The vlog95
target translates
```
module test(output integer x);
endmodule
```
to
```
module test(x);
output x;
integer x;
endmodule
```
which then fails when being elaborated again. There were some regression
tests that were failing because of this that will now pass.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The base type for an enum type can be a type identifier for a typedef as
long as it resolves to a vector or integer type with at most one packed
dimension. This is described in section 6.19 ("Enumerations") of the LRM
(1800-2017). E.g.
```
typedef bit [3:0] T;
enum T {
A
} e;
```
Add support for this by allowing to specify a type identifier as the base
type for an enum in the parser. During elaboration it is checked whether
the type identifier resolves to a valid enum base type.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To determine the base type structs and packed arrays call the
figure_packed_base_type() for their sub-types.
This method is not defined for enum or atom2 types and the default
implementation returns IVL_VT_NO_TYPE.
As a result packed arrays of enum or atom2 types and packed structs with
members of enum or atom2 types get elaborated with IVL_VT_NO_TYPE
as the base type.
For example
```
struct packed {
bit signed [31:0] x;
} s1;
```
gets elaborated with a base type of IVL_VT_BOOL, while
```
struct packed {
int x;
} s2;
```
gets elaborated with a base type of IVL_VT_NONE.
To fix this define the figure_packed_base_type() for enum_type_t and
atom2_type_t.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some types, i.e. vector types with parameterized dimensions,
may have different elaboration results in different scopes.
Handle those cases in the elaboration caches.
In vvp, create the .var/str variable for representing strings, and
handle strings in the $display system task.
Add to vvp threads the concept of a stack of strings. This is going to
be how complex objects are to me handled in the future: forth-like
operation stacks. Also add the first two instructions to minimally get
strings to work.
In the parser, handle the variable declaration and make it available
to the ivl_target.h code generator. The vvp code generator can use this
information to generate the code for new vvp support.
Parse typedefs with structs and enums, but give a sorry message,
because they are not yet supported. Rearrange some of the parse
rules for variables in order to increase comonality with the
typedef rules.
The l-value of a defparam assignment is a hierarchical name that may
include array selects to select scopes from module arrays. Therefore
it makes no sense to store parsed defparams in a map. Instead, they
should go into an ordered list. This also maked more sense because later
defparams *may* have the same name as a previous defparam, and will
override the previous defparam. So replace the map of parsed defparams
with a list of parsed defparams.
Also, as soon as the defparam expression is elaborated, the list entry
is no longer needed, so delete it. Save memory.
Lars-Peter Clausen
Martin Whitaker
Stephen Williams
Arun Persaud
steve