Currently typedefs are just a pointer to a data_type_t.
Currently typedefs are implemented by setting the name field of a
data_type_t when a typedef of the type is declared. This works mostly, but
there are some corner cases that can't be supported.
E.g. a typedef of a typedef does not work as it overwrites the name field
of the same data_type_t multiple times.
Forward typedefs can also not be supported since forward typedefs allow to
reference a type before it has been declared.
There are also some problems with type identifier references from a
higher-level scope if there is a type identifier in the current scope with
the same name, but it is declared after the type identifier has been
referenced. E.g. in the following x should be a vector fo width 8, but it
will be a vector of width 4, because while the right type is used it is
elaborated in the wrong scope.
```
localparam A = 8;
typedef logic [A-1:0] T;
module M;
localparam A = 4;
T x;
typedef int T;
endmodule
```
Furthermore typedefs used for the type of ports are elaborated in the wrong
scope.
To handle these corner case issues introduce a data_type_t for typedefs.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This implements and enforces the full set of rules for determining
timescales in SystemVerilog. The previous relaxation of the rules
that allowed timescales to be redefined within the compilation unit
scope has been removed. Time unit and precision redeclarations are
now recognised after a nested module declaration.
SystemVerilog allows tasks, functions, and classes to be defined at the
root level or inside packages, so we can't rely on an enclosing module
being present to provide the timescale.
If a static variable declared in a task, function, or block has an
initialisation expression, SystemVerilog requires the declaration to
have an explicit static lifetime. This is supposed to be a compile
error, but for now just output a warning.
Implementing this required adding support in the parser for explicit
lifetimes in variable declarations. For now, just output an error if
the user asks for a lifetime that isn't the default for that scope.
Class methods belong in a class scope, not the containing module.
So create a lexical scope that carries tasks and functions and
create a PClass to represent classes.
Within generate schemes it is possible to have nested scopes, even
more liberally then outside generate blocks. So see to it that the
scopes properly stack with the generate blocks, and that wires and
behaviors are put in the right scopes.
Named begin/end blocks burried within generate schemes need to be
elaborated. Handle this by remembering to elaborate_scope on the
statements within the generate scheme.
In the process, clean up/regularize some of the member names and
methods.
Move the storage of wires (signals) out of the Module class into
the PScope base class, and instead of putting the PWires all into
the Module object, distribute them into the various lexical scopes
(derived from PScope) so that the wire names do not need to carry
scope information.
This required some rewiring of elaboration of signals, and rewriting
of lexical scope handling.
All the pform objects that represent lexical scope now are derived
from the PScope class, and are kept in a lexical_scope table so that
the scope can be managed.
Modules, functions and tasks are named scopes so derive them all
from the PScope base class. These items all take scoped items, so
the eventual plan is to move these items into PScope.
Lars-Peter Clausen
Martin Whitaker
Maciej Suminski
Arun Persaud
Stephen Williams