verilator/test_regress/t/t_cover_toggle_min.info.out

TN:verilator_coverage
SF:t/t_cover_toggle_min.v
DA:10,1
BRDA:10,0,0,1
BRDA:10,0,1,0
BRDA:10,0,2,0
BRDA:10,0,3,0
DA:11,1
BRDA:11,0,0,0
BRDA:11,0,1,0
BRDA:11,0,2,1
BRDA:11,0,3,0
DA:12,1
BRDA:12,0,0,1
BRDA:12,0,1,1
BRDA:12,0,2,1
BRDA:12,0,3,0
BRF:12
BRH:0
end_of_record
Fix toggle coverage aggregation on same line (#5248) Documentation states that minimum of all reported coverage of all signals in a line should be taken. Previous logic would break if there were any signals with zero coverage followed by signals with nonzero coverage - a minimum from those nonzero toggle count would be taken, disregarding zero coverage of previous signals. Internal-tag: [#62193] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Obłonczek <koblonczek@antmicro.com> 2024-07-14 23:05:58 +02:00			`TN:verilator_coverage`
			`SF:t/t_cover_toggle_min.v`
Change to use maximum for cover point aggregation (#5402) 2024-09-09 20:20:18 +02:00			`DA:10,1`
Add partial coverage symbol and branch data in lcov info files (#5388) 2024-09-07 00:15:18 +02:00			`BRDA:10,0,0,1`
			`BRDA:10,0,1,0`
Support separate coverage counters for toggles 0->1 and 1->0 (#6086) 2025-08-20 13:31:04 +02:00			`BRDA:10,0,2,0`
			`BRDA:10,0,3,0`
Change to use maximum for cover point aggregation (#5402) 2024-09-09 20:20:18 +02:00			`DA:11,1`
Add partial coverage symbol and branch data in lcov info files (#5388) 2024-09-07 00:15:18 +02:00			`BRDA:11,0,0,0`
Support separate coverage counters for toggles 0->1 and 1->0 (#6086) 2025-08-20 13:31:04 +02:00			`BRDA:11,0,1,0`
			`BRDA:11,0,2,1`
			`BRDA:11,0,3,0`
			`DA:12,1`
			`BRDA:12,0,0,1`
Add partial coverage symbol and branch data in lcov info files (#5388) 2024-09-07 00:15:18 +02:00			`BRDA:12,0,1,1`
Support separate coverage counters for toggles 0->1 and 1->0 (#6086) 2025-08-20 13:31:04 +02:00			`BRDA:12,0,2,1`
			`BRDA:12,0,3,0`
			`BRF:12`
Add partial coverage symbol and branch data in lcov info files (#5388) 2024-09-07 00:15:18 +02:00			`BRH:0`
Fix toggle coverage aggregation on same line (#5248) Documentation states that minimum of all reported coverage of all signals in a line should be taken. Previous logic would break if there were any signals with zero coverage followed by signals with nonzero coverage - a minimum from those nonzero toggle count would be taken, disregarding zero coverage of previous signals. Internal-tag: [#62193] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Obłonczek <koblonczek@antmicro.com> 2024-07-14 23:05:58 +02:00			`end_of_record`