**Problem**
You want to get started with sbt, and you don't know
which template to get started with.
**Solution**
This implements an interactive menu on `sbt new` command
when invoked without an argument to list template candidates.
The first option is `scala/toolkit.local`, which locally creates
an sbt build without calling out to Giter8 (GitHub).
**Problem**
Coursier bump PR is currently failing due to shading of zstd.
**Solution**
1. Rather than updating the shading rule, this excludes zstd out of the
transitive since we likely won't need it.
2. Update coursier to 2.1.2.
Expose what the incremental compiler is doing behind the scenes. The RunProfiler interface has been part of Zinc for a while, but this allows the build itself, or an Sbt plugin, to hook their own implementation.
We expose a list of such listeners to avoid plugins stepping on each other and replacing an existing listener.
This key has been added in 4061dabf4d but it is only available to Sbt itself. Since ExternalHooks is a Java interface, defined in Zinc for a while and fairly stable, I think this should be safe to do.
My main motivation is to allow installing an InvalidationProfiler from an Sbt plugin, thus gaining access to zinc recompilation decisions. See related PR https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/1181
Artifactory rejects the legacy artifacts of sbt plugin.
It is now possible to publish to Artifactory
by turning `sbtPluginPublishLegacyMavenStyle` off.
Problem
-------
In sbt 1, platform cross building is implemented using in the user-land
using `%%%` operator, which clevery handles both Scala cross building
and appending platform suffix like sjs1.
However, in general symbolic `%%%` is confusing, and hard to explain.
Solution
--------
In sbt 2, we should subsume the idea of platform cross building,
so `%%` can act as the current `%%%` operator.
This adds a new setting called `platform`, which defaults to
`Platform.jvm` by default.
When a subprojects sets it to `Platform.sjs1`, `ModuleID`s defined using
`%%` operator will inject the platform suffix `_sjs1` **in addition**
to the Scala binary suffix `_2.13` etc.
Note: Explicit JVM dependencies will now require `.platform(Platform.jvm)`.
Problem
In sbt 1, platform cross building is implemented using in the user-land
using `%%%` operator, which clevery handles both Scala cross building
and appending platform suffix like sjs1.
However, in general symbolic `%%%` is confusing, and hard to explain.
Solution
In sbt 2, we should subsume the idea of platform cross building,
so `%%` can act as the current `%%%` operator.
This adds a new field called `platformOpt` to `ModuleID`, which
by default will be set to `None`.
`ScalaModuleInfo` will also add a new field called `platform`,
which can be set to `None`, `Some(sjs1)` etc.
As part of module transformation (like adding `_2.13`), the library
management engine can transform `ModuleID` to `sjs1` etc.
`("com.github.scopt" %% "scopt" % "4.1.0").platform(jvm)` will
explicitly use the JVM version of dependency (equivalent to today's `%%`).
See https://eed3si9n.com/simplifying-sbt-with-common-settings/
Problem
-------
The behavior of bare settings is confusing in a multi-project build.
This is partly due to the fact that to use `ThisBuild` scoping
the build user needs to be aware of the task implementation,
and know if the task is already defined at project level.
Solution
--------
This changes the interpretation of the baresettings to be common
settings, which works similar to the way `ThisBuild` behaves in sbt 1.x,
but since this would be a simple append at project-level, it should
work for any tasks or settings.
Eugene Yokota
dependabot[bot]
yoshinorin
Liang Yan
adpi2
Iulian Dragos
Nicolas Rinaudo
Scala Steward
Matthew de Detrich
Arman Bilge
Vedant