+ Don't notify ScriptMain users by moving the logic to xMain
+ Only trigger shell if shell is a defined command
+ Use existing Shell/BootCommand strings instead of new ones
Have sbt.version set in project/build.properties is a best practice
because it makes the build more deterministic and reproducible.
With this change sbt, after ensuring that the base directory is probably
an sbt project, writes out sbt.version in project/build.properties if it
is missing.
Fixes#754
The sbt/sbt-launcher-package doesn't invoke sbt with the "shell"
command. sbt has a mechanism for handling this in its "boot" command
that adds an "iflast shell" to the commands. Handle this when displaying
the "Executing in batch mode" warning.
Fixes#3004
Notify & enable users to stay in sbt's shell on the warm JVM by hitting
[ENTER] while sbt is running.
Looks like this; first I run 'sbt about', then I hit [ENTER]:
$ sbt about
[info] !!! Executing in batch mode !!! For better performance, hit [ENTER] to remain in the sbt shell
[info] Loading global plugins from /Users/dnw/.dotfiles/.sbt/0.13/plugins
[info] Loading project definition from /s/t/project
[info] Set current project to t (in build file:/s/t/)
[info] This is sbt 0.13.14-SNAPSHOT
[info] The current project is {file:/s/t/}t 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT
[info] The current project is built against Scala 2.12.1
[info] Available Plugins: sbt.plugins.IvyPlugin, sbt.plugins.JvmPlugin, sbt.plugins.CorePlugin, sbt.plugins.JUnitXmlReportPlugin, sbt.plugins.Giter8TemplatePlugin
[info] sbt, sbt plugins, and build definitions are using Scala 2.10.6
>
>
Fixes#2987
This adds a macro-level hack to support += op for sourceGenerators and resourceGenerators using RHS of Initialize[Task[Seq[File]]].
When the types match up, the macro now calls `.taskValue` automatically.
Before this commit, using dotty in your sbt project required to add:
scalaCompilerBridgeSource := ("ch.epfl.lamp" % "dotty-sbt-bridge" %
scalaVersion.value % "component").sources()
in your build.sbt. We might as well automatically do this, this reduces
the boilerplate for using dotty in your project to:
scalaOrganization := "ch.epfl.lamp"
scalaVersion := "0.1.1-SNAPSHOT"
scalaBinaryVersion := "2.11" // dotty itself is only published as a
// 2.11 artefact currently
Fixes#2460Fixes#2851
Ref #2707, #2708, #2469
Unlike the previous attempts at fixing the handling of build-level
keys, this change does not change the main parsing logic, which uses
`getKey` to retrieve the key from the key map.
The fact that shell worked pre-0.13.11 means that the parsing was ok.
What this changes is just the "example" keys supplied to the parser so
the tab completion works.
Fixes#2761
With sbt 0.13.13-RC1 rediscovered that the dependency pulled in from
Giter8 was affecting the plugins. To avoid this, this change splits up
the template resolver implementation to another module called
sbt-giter8-resolver, and it will be downloaded using Ivy into
`~/.sbt/0.13/templates/`, and then launched reflectively using Java as
the interface.
The compiler interface subclasses `scala.tools.nsc.Global`,
and loading this new subclass before each `compile` task forces
HotSpot JIT to deoptimize larges swathes of compiled code. It's
a bit like SBT has rigged the dice to always descend the longest
ladder in a game of Snakes and Ladders.
The slowdown seems to be larger with Scala 2.12. There are a number
of variables at play, but I think the main factor here is that
we now rely on JIT to devirtualize calls to final methods in traits
whereas we used to emit static calls. JIT does a good job at this,
so long as classloading doesn't undo that good work.
This commit extends the existing `ClassLoaderCache` to encompass
the classloader that includes the compiler interface JAR. I've
resorted to adding a var to `AnalyzingCompiler` to inject the
dependency to get the cache to the spot I need it without binary
incompatible changes to the intervening method signatures.
Backports #2741, Fixes#1041e93c445 added a feature called early command, which uses `--` as a
prefix to denote some commands that runs ahead of session loading.
While the feature might be useful especially for logging, `--` is too
useful just for this purpose.
In addition, this adds log level commands with single `-`, such as
-error to treat them as early commands; and keeps `--` variant for log
level for backward compatibility.
* Backport style changes in tests and Defaults.scala
This backports the scripted tests and Defaults.scala style changes to
use `build.sbt` and `:=`.
* Fix backport
* Deprecate the old operators `<<=`, `<+=`, and `<++=`
The no-longer-documented operators `<<=`, `<+=`, and `<++=` are
deprecated in anticipation of the removal in sbt 1.0. Ref #2711
For `<<=`, the suggested migration would be to use either `:=` or `~=`
operators. The RHS of `<<=` takes an `Initialize[_]` expression, which
can be converted to `:=` style by wrapping the expression in
parenthesis, and calling `.value` at the end.
This adds support to generate synthetic subprojects from an auto plugin.
In addition, a method called `projectOrigin` is added to distinguish
Organic, BuildExtra, ProjectExtra, and GenericRoot.
Calling the `.value` method on an input task returns `InputTask[A]`, which is completely unintuitive. I think it's basically a bug in `.value`. This change deprecates the `.value` call on input tasks, in preparation to the removal in sbt 1.0.
In most cases `.evaluated` should be called, which returns `A` by evaluating the task. Just in case `InputTask[A]` is needed, `inputTaskValue` method is now provided.
One of the motivation for doing this now is the deprecation of old operators `<<=`, which forces more users to convert to the `:=` style and potentially run into the `.value` behavior.
PR #2469 added build keys to tab completion, with the side effect of
considering as available candidate in key selection, thus making sbt
think that some inputs were ambiguous (e.g. `baseDirectory`): should it
apply to the current project or to the build level key?
This commit fixes this issue by improving the key selection:
- If there's no candidate, we return the default key
- If there's a single possible project level key, and zero or more
build level keys, then we select the project level key.
- If there are zero project level key, and a single build level key,
then we select the build level key
- If there are multiple candidates, sbt says that the input is
ambiguous.
Fixes#2707