In order to make the console task work with scala 2.13 and the thin
client, we need to provide a way for the scala repl to use an sbt
provided jline3 terminal instead of the default terminal typically built
by the repl. We also need to put jline 3 higher up in the classloading
hierarchy to ensure that two versions of jline 3 are not loaded (which
makes it impossible to share the sbt terminal with the scala terminal).
One impact of this change is the decoupling of the version of
jline-terminal used by the in process scala console and the version
of jline-terminal specified by the scala version itself. It is possible
to override this by setting the `useScalaReplJLine` flag to true. When
that is set, the scala REPL will run in a fully isolated classloader. That
will ensure that the versions are consistent. It will, however, for sure
break the thin client and may interfere with the embedded shell ui.
As part of this work, I also discovered that jline 3 Terminal.getSize is
very slow. In jline 2, the terminal attributes were automatically cached with a
timeout of, I think, 1 second so it wasn't a big deal to call
Terminal.getAttributes. The getSize method in jline 3 is not cached and
it shells out to run a tty command. This caused a significant
performance regression in sbt because when progress is enabled, we call
Terminal.getSize whenever we log any messages. I added caching of
getSize at the TerminalImpl level to address this. The timeout is 1
second, which seems responsive enough for most use cases. We could also
move the calculation onto a background thread and have it periodically
updated, but that seems like overkill.
sbt depends on scalacache (which hasn't been updated in about a year)
and we really don't need the functionality provided by scalacache. In
fact, the java api is somewhat easier to work with for our use case. The
motivation is that scalacache uses slf4j for logging which meant that it
was implicitly loading log4j. This caused some noisy logs during
shutdown when the previously unused cache was initialized just to be
cleaned up.
This commit also upgrades caffeine and moving forward we can always
upgrade caffeine (and potentially shade it) without any conflict with
the scalacache version.
Ref https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/744
This implements `ThisBuild / usePipelining`, which configures subproject pipelining available from Zinc 1.4.0.
The basic idea is to start subproject compilation as soon as pickle JARs (early output) becomes available. This is in part enabled by Scala compiler's new flags `-Ypickle-java` and `-Ypickle-write`.
The other part of magic is the use of `Def.promise`:
```
earlyOutputPing := Def.promise[Boolean],
```
This notifies `compileEarly` task, which to the rest of the tasks would look like a normal task but in fact it is promise-blocked. In other words, without calling full `compile` task together, `compileEarly` will never return, forever waiting for the `earlyOutputPing`.
Ref https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/5710
Ref https://github.com/sbt/librarymanagement/pull/339
This adds `versionScheme` setting. When set, it is included into POM, and gets picked up on the other side as an extra attribute of ModuleID. That information in turn is used to inform the eviction warning.
This should reduce the false positives associated with SemVer'ed libraries showing up in the eviction warning.
There were a number of unused key lint warnings when loading the sbt
build. In the case of `fork in compile` and `crossVersion in update`, it
wasn't clear that these were actually used, so I removed those settings.
The others seemed to be used so I just added them to the exclude list.
To make this work with legacy versions of sbt, I redefined the
excludeLintKeys key. Once we update the build.properties to a 1.4.x
version, we can drop the `val excludeLint` definition and replace
`excludeLint` with `excludeLintKeys`.
Side note: ++= does not work with excludeLintKeys which is why I used +=
for the excludes.
This commit upgrades sbt to using jline3. The advantage to jline3 is
that it has a significantly better tab completion engine that is more
similar to what you get from zsh or fish.
The diff is bigger than I'd hoped because there are a number of
behaviors that are different in jline3 vs jline2 in how the library
consumes input streams and implements various features. I also was
unable to remove jline2 because we need it for older versions of the
scala console to work correctly with the thin client. As a result, the
changes are largely additive.
A good amount of this commit was in adding more protocol so that the
remote client can forward its jline3 terminal information to the server.
There were a number of minor changes that I made that either fixed
outstanding ui bugs from #5620 or regressions due to differences between
jline3 and jline2.
The number one thing that caused problems is that the jline3 LineReader
insists on using a NonBlockingInputStream. The implementation ofo
NonBlockingInputStream seems buggy. Moreover, sbt internally uses a
non blocking input stream for system in so jline is adding non blocking
to an already non blocking stream, which is frustrating.
A long term solution might be to consider insourcing LineReader.java
from jline3 and just adapting it to use an sbt terminal rather than
fighting with the jline3 api. This would also have the advantage of not
conflicting with other versions of jline3. Even if we don't, we may want to
shade jline3 if that is possible.
This commit makes it possible for the sbt server to render the same ui
to multiple clients. The network client ui should look nearly identical
to the console ui except for the log messages about the experimental
client.
The way that it works is that it associates a ui thread with each
terminal. Whenever a command starts or completes, callbacks are invoked
on the various channels to update their ui state. For example, if there
are two clients and one of them runs compile, then the prompt is changed
from AskUser to Running for the terminal that initiated the command
while the other client remains in the AskUser state. Whenever the client
changes uses ui states, the existing thread is terminated if it is
running and a new thread is begun.
The UITask formalizes this process. It is based on the AskUser class
from older versions of sbt. In fact, there is an AskUserTask which is
very similar. It uses jline to read input from the terminal (which could
be a network terminal). When it gets a line, it submits it to the
CommandExchange and exits. Once the next command is run (which may or
may not be the command it submitted), the ui state will be reset.
The debug, info, warn and error commands should work with the multi
client ui. When run, they set the log level globally, not just for the
client that set the level.
In order to support a multi-client sbt server ux, we need to factor
`Terminal` out into a class instead of a singleton. Each terminal provides
and outputstream and inputstream. In all of the places where we were
previously relying on the `Terminal` singleton we need to update the
code to use `Terminal.get`, which will redirect io to the terminal whose
command is currently running.
This commit does not implement the server side ui for network clients.
It is just preparatory work for the multi-client ui.
The Terminal implementations have thread safe access to the output
stream. For this reason, I had to remove the sychronization on the
ConsoleOut lockObject. There were code paths that led to deadlock when
synchronizing on the lockObject.
Eugene Yokota
Ethan Atkins
Alexandre Archambault
Anil Kumar Myla
Dale Wijnand