Fixes#1455
* Add a mechanism to detect if a plugin clause includes/excludes
a particular plugin.
* Add a filter for our "enabling" clauses so that user-excluded
root plugins do not show up.
* Add a test to ensure this succeed.
Adds `lastestSnapshots` flag to `updateOptions`, which controls the behavior of the chained resolver. Up until 0.13.6, sbt was picking the first `-SNAPSHOT` revision it found along the chain. When is enabled (default: ), it will look into all resolvers on the chain, and compare them using the publish date.
The tradeoff is probably a longer resolution time if you have many remote repositories on the build or you live away from the severs. So here's how to disable it:
updateOptions := updateOptions.value.withLatestSnapshots(false)
Ivy by default uses latest-revision as the latest strategy. This strategy I don't think takes in account for the possibility that a changing revision may exist in multiple repositories/resolvers with having identical version number like 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
The implementation is a bit hacky, but I think it attacks the core of this problem.
* Create a project "common" which publishes a "bad" artifact.
* Resolve project "dependent" which resolves the "bad" artifact into the cache.
* Publish a new "common" snapshot to a diffferent repository (publishLocal)
* Attempt to build the new project, leading to issues.
Commit a1e26ca6 broke the `make-pom` & `pom-advanced` dependency-management
tests by replacing one reference to `IBiblioResolver.DEFAULT_M2_ROOT` in
`Resolver`, but not the other reference in `MakePom`:
https://travis-ci.org/sbt/sbt/jobs/31939788#L2517-L2519
...the secure url was no longer recognised as the default Maven Repository
root, so was erroneously exported.
When the compiler reports back the error to CompilationUnit created by Eval#mkUnit, it sometimes returns OffsetPosition whose `source` is set to `NoSourceFile`.
This causes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. The current workaround is to pattern match on the passed in pos and create a new one when the incoming source looks suspicious.
I have not figured out whether this is caused by our macro code or compiler.
There are various build.sbt errors that would cause this behavior:
```scala
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
depA
depB // missing comma
)
lazy val bob = scala.Console println
test ++
run+
```
Scope.parseScopedKey now supports full range of legal keys
described in the documentation including {.} and other
notation for ProjectRef, BuildRef, and ThisBuild.
eugene yokota
Josh Suereth
Roberto Tyley
Jacek Laskowski
Evgeny Goldin