In contrast to the unix version of the sbt launcher, the windows
version lacks the functionality of specifying JAVA_HOME via launch
parameters. This commit adds the missing --java-home parameter to
sbt.bat.
In some cases, comp.append could be an empty string. This would happen
if a parser was something like `(token(foo) <~ ;).+ <~ fo.?` because there were
no completions for the `fo` available anchor. The effect of this was
that tab would never complete foo;f to foo;foo, even though that was the
only possible completion. It would, _display_, foo as a possible
completion though.
This came up because the multi parser has a similar parser to that
described above and it broke tab completion to the right of a semi
colon.
The multi parser had very poor performance if there were many commands.
Evaluating the expansion of something like "compile;" * 30 could cause
sbt to hang indefinitely. I believe this was due to excessive
backtracking due to the optional `(parser <~ semi.?).?` part of the
parser in the non-leading semicolon case.
I also reworked the implementation so that the multi command now has a
name. This allows us to partition the commands into multi and non-multi
commands more easily in State while still having multi in the command
list. With this change, builds and plugins can exclude the multi parser
if they wish.
Using the partitioned parsers, I removed the high/priority low priority
distinction. Instead, I made it so that the multi command will actually
check if the first command is a named command, like '~'. If it is, it
will pass the raw command argument with the named command stripped out
into the parser for the named command. If that is parseable, then we
directly apply the effect. Otherwise we prefix each multi command to the
state.
The `session save` command has the side effect of modifying a "*.sbt"
file so we don't want to warn about changes or automatically reload when
we return to the shell. Setting the hasCheckedMetaBuild attribute key to
false is sufficient to prevent this.
Ref: https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/4813
It didn't really make sense for Continuous to use the other command
parser and then reparse the results. I was able to slightly simplify
things by using the multi parser directly.
We run into issues if we naively split the command input on ';' and
treat each part as a separate command unless the ';' is inside of a
string because it is also valid to have ';'s inside of braced
expressions, e.g. `set foo := { val x = 1; x + 1 }`. There was no parser
for expressions enclosed in braces. I add one that should parse any
expression wrapped in braces so long as each opening brace is matched by a
closing brace. The parser returns the original expression. This allows
the multi parser to ignore ';' inside of '{...}'.
I had to rework the scripted tests to individually run 'reload' and
'setUpScripted' because the new parser rejects setUpScripted because it
isn't a valid command until reload has run.
It was reported in https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/4808 that compared
to 1.2.8, sbt 1.3.0-RC2 will truncate the command args of an input task
that contains semicolons. This is actually intentional, but not
completely robust. For sbt >= 1.3.0, we are making ';' syntactically
meaningful. This means that it always represents a command separator
_unless_ it is inside of a quoted string. To enforce this, the multi parser
will effectively split the input on ';', it will then validate that each
command that it extracted is valid. If not, it throws an exception. If
the input is not a multi command, then parsing fails with a normal
failure.
I removed the multi command from the state's defined commands and reworked
State.combinedParser to explicitly first try multi parsing and fall back
to the regular combined parser if it is a regular command. If the multi
parser throws an uncaught exception, parsing fails even if the regular
parser could have successfully parsed the command. The reason is so that
we do not ever allow the user to evaluate, say 'run a;b'. Otherwise the
behavior would be inconsitent when the user runs 'compile; run a;b'
I noticed that in 1.3.0-RC2, the following commands worked:
++2.11.12 ;test
;++2.11.12;test
but
++2.11.12; test
did not. This issue is fixed in the next commit.
Alexandre Archambault
Alexandre Archambault
Scala Steward
Christian Lachner
Steve Waldman
Eugene Yokota
Ethan Atkins
kenji yoshida
Dale Wijnand