* Puppies may rest easy from the removal of Option.get calls.
* better names for config values
* Added a helper method to avoid any possible code duplication, besides repeated def, val, match and for keywords.
Looking for ways to remove this duplciation ASAP.
* Moved from pattern match to ._1, my most hated member.
when a properties file is not otherwise explicitly specified,
the sbt.version from project/build.properties is used to select
the default properties file to use. This launcher should be able
to launch:
0.7.x
0.10.{0,1}
0.11.{0,1,2,3}
0.12.x
Note that it can only launch the release versions of 0.10 and 0.11
listed above and in particular cannot launch snapshot versions. All
0.12.x versions and 0.7.x versions should be supported, although only
0.7.7 was tested.
Problems:
1. Without a message, users don't find 'last'
2. Showing a message for every error clutters output.
This tries to address these issues by:
1. Only showing the message when other feedback has not been provided and
'last' would not usually be helpful. This will require ongoing tweaking.
For now, all commands except 'compile' display the message. 'update' could
omit the message as well, but perhaps knowing about 'last' might be
useful there.
2. Including the exact command to show the output:
last test:compile
and not just
last <task>
3. Highlighting the command in blue for visibility as an experiment.
Review by @ijuma and @retronym, please.
Problems:
1. Without a message, users don't find 'last'
2. Showing a message for every error clutters output.
This tries to address these issues by:
1. Only showing the message when other feedback has not been provided and
'last' would not usually be helpful. This will require ongoing tweaking.
For now, all commands except 'compile' display the message. 'update' could
omit the message as well, but perhaps knowing about 'last' might be
useful there.
2. Including the exact command to show the output:
last test:compile
and not just
last <task>
3. Highlighting the command in blue for visibility as an experiment.
Review by @ijuma and @retronym, please.