It drives me crazy that in intellij when I do the go to class task that
TestBuild.Keys comes up before Keys. Given how central Keys is to sbt,
it doesn't seem like a good idea to alias that particular class name.
whitesourceOnPush calls whitesourceCheckPolicies and whitesourceUpdate on push.
Since Travis CI secrets are not available during PR from a fork, there's no point in calling these during the PR validation.
The illegalReference check did not actually validate whether the illegal
reference actually referred to an M[_] (which is pretty much always
Initialize[_]]). The means by which this failure was induces were fairly
obscure and go through multiple levels of macro transformations that I
attempt to explain in the comment in IllegalReferenceSpec.
Fixes#3110
I am generally of the opinion that a linter should not abort progress by
default. I do, however, think that it should be on by default, making
warn a happy compromise.
The user should be able to configure whether or not the task linting is
strictly enforced. In my opinion, the linter is generally pretty good
about warning users that a particular definition may not behave the way
the user expects. Unfortunately, it is fairly common that the user
explicitly wants this behavior and making the linter abort compilation
is a frustrating user experience.
To fix this, I add the LinterLevel trait to a new sbt.dsl package in the
core-macros project. The user can configure the linter to:
1) abort when an issue is detected. This is the current default behavior.
2) print a warning when an issues is detected
3) skip linting all together
Linter configuration is managed by importing the corresponding implicit
object from the LinterLevel companion object.
Fixes#3266
There are many cases where one would want to force evaluation of the
task even when contained in a lambda (see
https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/3266). The @sbtUnchecked annotation is
one way to disable the linter that prevents this, but it is obscure. If
the annotation is to exist, I think it should be presented as a
solution.
I found it somewhat difficult to reason about the state of the tree
Traverser because of the usage of mutable variables and data structures.
For example, I determined that the uncheckedWrappers were never used
non-locally so a Set didn't seem to be the right data structure. It was
reasonably straightforward to switch to a more functional style by
parameterizing the method local traverser class.
Bonus:
- remove unused variable disableNoValueReport
- add scaladoc to document the input parameters of the traverser class
so that it's a bit easier to understand for future maintainers.
This cleans up all of the yellow intellij warnings for me. It still
complains about some typos, but those manifest as green squiggled lines
which are less annoying.
It was becoming a pain to work on these files in intellij because the
auto-import feature would implicitly optimize all of the imports in
these files, leading to a large diff. I'd then have to go and manually
add the import that I care about. This change does add some wildcard
imports, which I don't always love, but these files are so unwieldy
already that I think it's worth it to have the imports follow the format
preferred by intellij.
This file was littered with intellij warnings due to public members and
fields not having their types annotated. Although in this case it didn't
really matter, it is good practice to always annotate public methods and
fields so that they can evolve in a binary compatible way.
Dale Wijnand
eugene yokota
Ethan Atkins
Antonio Cunei
Ólafur Páll Geirsson
Arnout Engelen
Alexandre Archambault