doit, comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6d1f1fa73
commit
b29b3afee2
|
|
@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ doit(struct line *deck) {
|
|||
|
||||
/* Here we loop through the deck looking for .subckt and .ends cards.
|
||||
* At the end of this section, last will point to the location of the
|
||||
* .subckt card, and lcc will point to the location of the .ends card.
|
||||
* .subckt card, and c will point to the location of the .ends card.
|
||||
* and lcc->li_next === c, thus lcc will be the last body card
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
int nest = 1;
|
||||
|
|
@ -470,15 +471,16 @@ doit(struct line *deck) {
|
|||
return (NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* last is the opening .subckt card */
|
||||
/* c is the terminating .ends card */
|
||||
/* lcc is one card before, which is the last body card */
|
||||
|
||||
sssfree = sss = alloc(struct subs);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( use_numparams==FALSE )
|
||||
lcc->li_next = NULL; /* shouldn't we free some memory here????? */
|
||||
|
||||
/* At this point, last points to the .subckt card, and lcc points to the .ends card */
|
||||
|
||||
/* what does this do!??!?! */
|
||||
/* cut the whole .subckt ... .ends sequence from the deck chain */
|
||||
if (lc)
|
||||
lc->li_next = c->li_next;
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
|
@ -507,6 +509,7 @@ doit(struct line *deck) {
|
|||
|
||||
sss->su_next = subs;
|
||||
subs = sss; /* Now that sss is built, assign it to subs */
|
||||
|
||||
last = c->li_next;
|
||||
|
||||
/*gp */
|
||||
|
|
@ -522,10 +525,7 @@ doit(struct line *deck) {
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
/* At this point, sss holds the .subckt definition found, subs holds
|
||||
* all .subckt defs found, including this one,
|
||||
* last points to the NULL at the end of the deck,
|
||||
* lc points to the last non-.subckt or .ends card,
|
||||
* and lcc points to the .ends card
|
||||
* all .subckt defs found, including this one
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sss) /* if sss == FALSE, we have found no subckts. Just return. */
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue