Argument order and type declaration mismatches:
Label *
portFindLabel(editDef, port, unique, nonEdit)
CellDef *editDef;
bool unique;
bool port; // If TRUE, only look for labels that are ports
bool *nonEdit; // TRUE if label is not in the edit cell
This warrants inspection at call site CmdLQ.c:1712 as both types are bool
is it not so straightforward to check.
It looks like when PORT_MAKE is the option 'port make [index] [dir...]'
port=FALSE is this the correct intention ? This looks ok in that
we're searching for labels to make (upgrade) into ports.
Where as all other 'port ....' commands are operating on items that are
already ports, and ignoring labels.
So the K&R argument name order is also how the call-sites are using it.
void
cmdStatsHier(parent, nuses, child)
CellDef *parent, *child;
int nuses;
This was checked and found ok as callback to ../database/DBcount.c
DBTreeCountPaint(... hiercount, ...)
Due to this not-obvious K&R style also being used in the documentation
this was changed as well (in another commit0.
K&R obsolete syntax removal for C23 compatibility series
Darryl L. Miles
Tim Edwards