Also corrected an error where the bounds search uses the device

type in the device record, which was not updated at the end of
checking terminals for matching device extraction types.  so the
boundary survey might see the wrong device type and generate an
incorrect boundary survey as a result.

extract/ExtBasic.c

@@ -1849,6 +1849,7 @@ extOutputDevices(def, transList, outFile)
 	    if (varsub != NULL) subsName = varsub;
 	}
 #endif
+	extTransRec.tr_devrec = devptr;
 
 	/* Original-style FET record backward compatibility */
 	if (devptr->exts_deviceClass != DEV_FET)
@@ -1948,6 +1949,7 @@ extOutputDevices(def, transList, outFile)
 		    arg.fra_uninit = (ClientData) extTransRec.tr_gatenode;
 		    arg.fra_region = (Region *) reg;
 		    arg.fra_each = extAnnularTileFunc;
+
 		    (void) ExtFindNeighbors(reg->treg_tile, arg.fra_pNum, &arg);
 
 		    extSeparateBounds(n - 1);	/* Handle MOScaps (if necessary) */