Additional correction for properly handling the substrate node
when generating the device outputs in the .res.ext file, which was one of the main points of this exercise.
This commit is contained in:
parent
59fc24729c
commit
a5248a95d3
|
|
@ -166,7 +166,10 @@ ResPrintExtDev(outextfile, devices)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fprintf(outextfile, " \"%s\"", subsName);
|
||||
if (devices->subs != NULL)
|
||||
fprintf(outextfile, " \"%s\"", devices->subs->name);
|
||||
else
|
||||
fprintf(outextfile, " \"%s\"", subsName);
|
||||
|
||||
fprintf(outextfile, " \"%s\" %d %s \"%s\" %d %s \"%s\" %d %s\n",
|
||||
devices->gate->name,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1165,18 +1165,17 @@ ResFixUpConnections(simDev, layoutDev, simNode, nodename)
|
|||
/* don't patch up networks. This cuts down on memory use. */
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ResOptionsFlags & (ResOpt_DoRsmFile | ResOpt_DoExtFile)) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (simDev->layout == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
layoutDev->rd_status |= RES_DEV_SAVE;
|
||||
simDev->layout = layoutDev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
simDev->status |= TRUE;
|
||||
if (strcmp(nodename,oldnodename) != 0)
|
||||
if (strcmp(nodename, oldnodename) != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
strcpy(oldnodename,nodename);
|
||||
strcpy(oldnodename, nodename);
|
||||
}
|
||||
sprintf(newname, "%s%s%d", nodename, ".t", resNodeNum++);
|
||||
notdecremented = TRUE;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1204,8 +1203,8 @@ ResFixUpConnections(simDev, layoutDev, simNode, nodename)
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (simDev->drain == simNode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((source = layoutDev->rd_fet_source) &&
|
||||
(drain = layoutDev->rd_fet_drain))
|
||||
if (((source = layoutDev->rd_fet_source) != NULL) &&
|
||||
((drain = layoutDev->rd_fet_drain) != NULL))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (source->rn_name != NULL && notdecremented)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue