Corrected an error from a recent commit: An attempt to add array
checks when checking for exactly overlapping instances of the same cell def was faulty and resulted in magic no longer detecting when unarrayed instances exactly overlap. Now both conditions (arrayed and not arrayed) should be handled correctly.
This commit is contained in:
parent
441d933148
commit
98aa2f760a
|
|
@ -108,25 +108,55 @@ DBCellFindDup(use, parent)
|
|||
"DBCellFindDup");
|
||||
while ((dupUse = BPEnumNext(&bpe)))
|
||||
if (dupUse->cu_def == use->cu_def)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool transMatch, arrayMatch, notXarray, notYarray;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Transforms must be equal---Aligned bounding boxes are
|
||||
* an insufficient measure of exact overlap. Also, array
|
||||
* counts and separation must match for arrayed devices
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((dupUse->cu_transform.t_a == use->cu_transform.t_a) &&
|
||||
transMatch = ((dupUse->cu_transform.t_a == use->cu_transform.t_a) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_b == use->cu_transform.t_b) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_c == use->cu_transform.t_c) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_d == use->cu_transform.t_d) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_e == use->cu_transform.t_e) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_f == use->cu_transform.t_f) &&
|
||||
((dupUse->cu_xhi > dupUse->cu_xlo) &&
|
||||
((dupUse->cu_xhi - dupUse->cu_xlo) ==
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_transform.t_f == use->cu_transform.t_f));
|
||||
|
||||
/* First check if both use and dupUse are not arrays. */
|
||||
notXarray = (dupUse->cu_xhi == dupUse->cu_xlo) &&
|
||||
(use->cu_xhi == use->cu_xlo);
|
||||
|
||||
notYarray = (dupUse->cu_yhi == dupUse->cu_ylo) &&
|
||||
(use->cu_yhi == use->cu_ylo);
|
||||
|
||||
arrayMatch = (notXarray && notYarray);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If they are arrays, then the array parameters must match. */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!notXarray && notYarray)
|
||||
{
|
||||
arrayMatch = ((dupUse->cu_xhi - dupUse->cu_xlo) ==
|
||||
(use->cu_xhi - use->cu_xlo)) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_xsep == use->cu_xsep);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (!notYarray && notXarray)
|
||||
{
|
||||
arrayMatch = ((dupUse->cu_yhi - dupUse->cu_ylo) ==
|
||||
(use->cu_yhi - use->cu_ylo)) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_ysep == use->cu_ysep);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (!notYarray && !notXarray)
|
||||
{
|
||||
arrayMatch = (((dupUse->cu_xhi - dupUse->cu_xlo) ==
|
||||
(use->cu_xhi - use->cu_xlo)) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_xsep == use->cu_xsep)) &&
|
||||
((dupUse->cu_yhi > dupUse->cu_ylo) &&
|
||||
((dupUse->cu_yhi - dupUse->cu_ylo) ==
|
||||
(((dupUse->cu_yhi - dupUse->cu_ylo) ==
|
||||
(use->cu_yhi - use->cu_ylo)) &&
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_ysep == use->cu_ysep)))
|
||||
(dupUse->cu_ysep == use->cu_ysep));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (transMatch && arrayMatch)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BPEnumTerm(&bpe);
|
||||
return dupUse;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue