Changed the behavior of "extract" routine extFindNodes() to not

check for abstract views to determine how to handle the substrate
node.  Running tests to check if this has any negative impact on
the extraction of abstract views that do not specify substrate
and well types.

VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-8.3.268
+8.3.269

extract/ExtBasic.c

@@ -3692,7 +3692,13 @@ extFindNodes(def, clipArea, subonly)
 
     temp_subsnode = (NodeRegion *)NULL;		// Reset for new search
     isabstract = FALSE;
-    DBPropGet(def, "LEFview", &isabstract);
+
+    // NOTE:  Commented out 12/17/2022.  This does not produce the intended
+    // result when an abstract view contains well and substrate types.
+    // Not sure if commenting it out produces the intended result when an
+    // abstract view does NOT contain will and substrate types, though.
+    /* DBPropGet(def, "LEFview", &isabstract); */
+
     if (!isabstract)
     {
 	/* First pass:  Find substrate.  Collect all tiles belonging	*/