Fix for GitHub issue #103 - vvp assertion failure on part select propagation.
The implementation of vvp_fun_part_pv::recv_vec4_pv was incorrect, and
propagated the incoming widths rather than the stored widths.
(cherry picked from commit 0c66116f51)
This commit is contained in:
parent
30257e0914
commit
06f6a72770
10
vvp/part.cc
10
vvp/part.cc
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2004-2014 Stephen Williams (steve@icarus.com)
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2004-2016 Stephen Williams (steve@icarus.com)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This source code is free software; you can redistribute it
|
||||
* and/or modify it in source code form under the terms of the GNU
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,8 +213,14 @@ void vvp_fun_part_pv::recv_vec4_pv(vvp_net_ptr_t port, const vvp_vector4_t&bit,
|
|||
vvp_context_t ctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(port.port() == 0);
|
||||
assert(bit.size() == wid);
|
||||
assert(base + wid <= vwid);
|
||||
assert(vwid == wid_);
|
||||
|
||||
port.ptr()->send_vec4_pv(bit, base, wid, vwid, ctx);
|
||||
vvp_vector4_t tmp(wid_, BIT4_Z);
|
||||
tmp.set_vec(base, bit);
|
||||
|
||||
port.ptr()->send_vec4_pv(tmp, base_, wid_, vwid_, ctx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void vvp_fun_part_pv::recv_vec8(vvp_net_ptr_t port, const vvp_vector8_t&bit)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue