Fixes#290.
Checking for overflow should be done before integer overflows.
There are two checks:
(result > limit / base) is used for limits greater than rounded up to base,
e.g. for 65535 it will activate for 65540 and higher.
(result * base > limit - digit) is used for limit+1 to limit+n below
next base rounded number, e.g. 65536 up to 65539.
* Fixes#240: Multiple long option names / aliases
* We now use a vector of long option names instead of a single name
* When specifying an option, you can provide multiple names separated by commas, at most one of which may have a length of 1 (not necessarily the first specified name). The length-1 name is the single-hyphen switch (the "short name").
* Hashing uses the first long name
* Option help currently only uses the first long name.
* Fixes#345, fixes#346, regards #340: Put exceptions in a sub-namespace and renamed them accordingly.
* Also fixed some "loose ends" regarding namespace indentation which were missing in PR #350.
* Dropped `required_option_missing` as it is unused.
Major refactor of the parsing code organisation to improve encapsulation
and not modify the input arguments. The returned result no longer has
pointers into the original option specification.
* Fixes#245:
* Added a new exception type: `option_has_no_value_exception`; throwing it when an option has no value we can cast with `as()`, instead of an `std::domain_error`.
* The `OptionValue` type now holds a pointer to the long option name (in its corresponding key within ParseResults's `m_results` field.
Fixes#96. Default values of options not specified on the command line
had a `count` of 1. It would be better if they had a count of 0 because
they were not actually specified, so that count is only for options
given by the user.
Fixes#83.
Adds an overload for positional arguments taking a
`std::initializer_list`. When using an `initializer_list` with one
argument, the function call is ambiguous matching both `std::string`
and `std::vector<std::string>`.
Fixes#84. Implicit values are not handled very well. For example:
--foo false true
--foo --bar
In the first, `false` is an argument to `--foo`, and then `true` is a
positional argument. In the second, because of the hyphen in `--bar`, `--foo`
is parsed with its implicit value. This seems inconsistent and unintuitive.
Better is that implicit values *never* consume the next parameter to be
completely consistent. This means that values with an implicit parameter
*must* be specified using the `--option=value` form.