From 5a23fa0e9a4697a3d9062d86743950429619bd20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jvican Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:11:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix #3160: Newline after comment line --- .../dependency-management/cached-resolution-conflicts/pending | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sbt/src/sbt-test/dependency-management/cached-resolution-conflicts/pending b/sbt/src/sbt-test/dependency-management/cached-resolution-conflicts/pending index 55385448d..9c88a5605 100644 --- a/sbt/src/sbt-test/dependency-management/cached-resolution-conflicts/pending +++ b/sbt/src/sbt-test/dependency-management/cached-resolution-conflicts/pending @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ # Quoting @eed3si9n in https://github.com/dwijnand/sbt-lm/pull/1 : -# # > After several experiments, I'm actually convinced that force() is unrelated to the scripted scenario, # > and it's # currently passing by virtue of the questionable caching behavior: # > https://github.com/sbt/sbt/blob/c223dccb542beaf763a3a2909cda74bdad39beca/ivy/src/main/scala/sbt/ivyint/CachedResolutionResolveEngine.scala#L715