README for NGSPICE ------------------ This long message describes what NG-SPICE may become in the (near ?) future. I used a question mark because, as you will read, most of the features of ng-spice are found on Hi-quality commercial products and (which is the true reason) I have no idea on how can be implemented. ** Why resurrecting Berkeley's Spice ? Berkeley's spice can be considered the father of most circuit simulator available today. It is an old but still good piece of software. It may not be the fastest or the most reliable, but it's free, it is available in source code, and most of the electrical simulators inherited it's syntax. On the more technical side, spice3f4(5) uses good numerical algorithms (commercial implementations have only strengthened them), implements most of the models for MOSFET submicron designs and has a powerful set of analyses. On the more "social" side: it's weel introduced in the academic environment. ** What does NG-SPICE mean ? It stands for Next Generation Spice but that's not the official name of the projest. This projects still lacks a name. NG-SPICE is a temporary name. ** What will NG-SPICE be ? Berkeley's Spice lacks in three directions: a) Graphical user interface (I prefer to say "the framework"). b) Documentation. c) Features in the code. * The framework: Spice is (and should continue to be) acommand line or a text tool, but this makes very difficult to design large circuits. To overcome this difficulty, a schematic entry tool and a waveform viewer tool are needed. Nevertheless, there are other tools that can be useful: a parts database, an editor which higlights the syntax, a symbol editor, etc. Most of these program already exists in the open source world, so they need ony to be integrated in a common EDA environment. This is the first direction of development. * Documentation: Commercial simulators (hi-end) have very good manuals with tutorials, models equation explained, example of use, suggestions, etc. This line of development has the task of provinding the final spice user with an orderd and comprehensive set of information on the program and it's features. The documentation should be useful for the student as well as for the circuit professional. * Improvements to the spice code: This is the hard part. Th target of this direction is to make ng-spice a commercial grade simulator. This means improving it's speed, it's numerical robustness, include the latest models available and some other important features. I will describe some of them briefly: - Analyses - Network analisys: given four nodes, extract z,y,s and the other double bipole paramters. Monte Carlo analisys: statistical simulation based on device tolerances. Worst Case analisys: find the worst case of operation of a given circuit based on device tolerances. Parametric analisys: repeat an analysis when one or more parameters assumes different values. - Devices - Behavioral device: enhance the B device of spice3 to accepts IF THEN ELSE conditions, and digital keywords like DELAY, HIGHV. LOWV, etc to simulate simple digital device. Dynamically loading of device: reduce the memory occupied by the simulator by using shared object code for devices. Each device is a .so library that is inserted only if the circuit contains an element modeled by the device. If we are simulating CMOS, we do not need BJT or SOI (in most of the situations). Code Level Modeling: Let users write their devices in C and use them in the simulator. I have discovered a couple of standars for doing this at the Sematech ftp site. Improving device: Include additional parameters to some devices: HDIF, LDIF, etc. (Serban, can you explain better). - Numerical Algs - Integration: include (if necessary) more stable algorithms for integration. Runge-Kutta Methods ? Linearization: Are there better algorithms for nonlinear equations the the Newton raphson ? - Sparse Matrix - Faster handling of sparse matrices. - Options - Possibility to mesure circuit pameters, like the delay between two nodes, etc. ... and others that will emerge during the project. Paolo Nenzi (pnenzi@ieee.ing.uniroma.it) NOTES: ------ This version builds correctly on redhat linux 6.0, and most probably on any glibc2-based linux distribution. The executables have hardly been tested, all I know is that they build. The main goal of this release is to get autoconf to work. The goal is to put all possible configurations flags into the autoconf support. It should build on most other unices (especially POSIX ones), please report to me if it does, or if you know how to fix it if it doesn't. As the -Wall flag is turned on during compilation, you will notice a HUGE amount of warnings - our first job should be to work on those to 'sanitize' the existing code. MAILING LISTS: ------------- There are three mailing lists dedicated to the development of ngspice. ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it: This list is the list for the users of the ng-spice simulator. ng-spice-devel@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it: ng-spice development issues. ng-spice-frontends@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it: issues related to development of frontends for ng-spice. To subscribe the list(s), send a message to: WEB SITE: -------- This project is hosted on the IEEE Central & South Italy Section Server. The home page is http://ieee.ing.uniroma1.it/ngspice Manu (emmanuel.rouat@wanadoo.fr) Paolo (p.nenzi@ieee.org)