From 522171510c724e4b34103f5cd6590d50e067f053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Edwards Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:09:58 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Moved the "Generating output" statement for "gds write" after the calls on subcells, as otherwise the statement is confusing. --- VERSION | 2 +- calma/CalmaWrite.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION index e5ffaa69..b89ac070 100644 --- a/VERSION +++ b/VERSION @@ -1 +1 @@ -8.3.123 +8.3.124 diff --git a/calma/CalmaWrite.c b/calma/CalmaWrite.c index a5e38473..ff4b83e9 100644 --- a/calma/CalmaWrite.c +++ b/calma/CalmaWrite.c @@ -809,9 +809,6 @@ calmaProcessDef(def, outf, do_library) if (isReadOnly && hasContent && CalmaAddendum) return (0); - /* Give some feedback to the user */ - TxPrintf(" Generating output for cell %s\n", def->cd_name); - /* * Output the definitions for any of our descendants that have * not already been output. Numbers are assigned to the subcells @@ -823,6 +820,9 @@ calmaProcessDef(def, outf, do_library) if (DBCellEnum(def, calmaProcessUse, (ClientData) outf) != 0) return 1; + /* Give some feedback to the user */ + TxPrintf(" Generating output for cell %s\n", def->cd_name); + if (isReadOnly && hasContent) { char *buffer, *offptr, *retfilename;