In generate blocks such as for loops, there may be many generated
scopes that have the same generated name. But in these cases, there
is an index number in the hname that can be used. So do so.
The reported problem was caused by a null statement in a case statement,
which caused the check for an infinite loop to fail. Further testing
exposed more problems with null statements in loop statements - these
caused crashes earlier in elaboration.
Implicit ports may be unnamed, either because the port expression
is not a simple/escaped identifier, or because there is no port
expression. To handle these cases, error messages should report
the port position as well as the port name.
The compiler was correctly detecting and reporting errors in loop
expressions and statements, but then crashing when it tried to build
the sensitivity list. Fix this by not adding a loop statement to the
netlist unless all its components have been successfully elaborated.
When unsized literals are used in case item expressions, it is likely
that the calculated expression width will be larger than necessary to
unambiguously select the correct case item (particularly when using
"strict" expression elaboration). This patch adds an optimisation
step that prunes the expressions to the minimum necessary width.
This goes all the way down to the vvp level, where we create support
for arrays of objects, generate the new code in the -tvvp code
generator, and elaborate the arrays in the first place.
The parser always passes a single NULL argument for system tasks. For a
method call which will add a signal to call the method on we need to
ignore this NULL argument.
This required keeping for-loops as actual things through the
netlist form so that the synthesizer can get at and understand
the parts of the for-loop. This may improve vvp code generation
in the future, but for now continue to present to the vvp code
generation the block-while form.
This gets nested l-values to (but just short of) the ivl_target API.
Now the elaborator can process nested l-values, but I haven't figured
out how to present that at the ivl_target.h API.
It is better to leave the handling of PChainConstructor calls to
the elaboration, instead of stripping them out early. This allows
for handling the arguments of the chain constructor in the correct
scope.
Christian Taedcke
Stephen Williams
Martin Whitaker
Martin Whitaker
Larry Doolittle
Maciej Suminski
Cary R