Check for various dynamic array and queue types that their type
compatibility is handled correctly.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Current regression tests only cover checking for invalid non-blocking
writes to constructs that are valid in Verilog. Add two tests to
additionally cover some SystemVerilog constructs.
* Non-blocking writes to members of a struct typed variable with automatic
lifetime
* Non-blocking writes to class typed variables with automatic lifetime
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that default values for class methods are handled correctly and it is
possible to omit any argument. Check it for both functions and tasks.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that it is possible to reference a package scoped identifier that has
the same name as a local identifier, but is a different kind of identifier.
* A variable or function identifier from a package scope if it is a
type identifier in the current scope
* A type identifier from a package scope if it is a non-type identifier
in the current scope
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that it is possible to declare an unpacked array type with an
unpacked array type as the base type.
Also check that it is possible to declare an signal with an unpacked array
dimension with an unpacked array base type.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that for a module port with an array type identifier the type is
elaborated in the right scope.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that package scope function calls work with and without arguments as
well as empty positional arguments.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that it is possible to copy empty dynamic arrays and queues.
If the target is a dynamic arrays there are two ways of copying. Through
direct assignment as well as the array new operator.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that a packed struct or union with an unpacked array, dynamic array
or queue as a member is detected as an error.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that all kinds of invalid repeated task port declarations are
detected as errors. They should not crash the application nor should they
result in successful elaboration.
The tests are created for corner cases that previously resulted in
incorrect behavior.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that all kinds of invalid module port declarations, where the
declaration conflicts with previous declarations, are detected as errors.
They should not crash the application nor should they result in successful
elaboration.
The tests are created for corner cases that previously resulted in
incorrect behavior.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that when port direction and data type are declared separately that
an error is reported if the port direction has an explicit range
specification, but the data type has not. This should even be the case if
the data type has an implicit range, e.g `int` or a struct type.
For vector types also check that it is an error if the ranges are not
identical.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that when port direction and data type are declared separately that
an error is reported if the port direction has an explicit range
specification, but the data type has not. This should even be the case if
the data type has an implicit range, e.g `int` or a struct type.
For vector types also check that it is an error if the ranges are not
identical.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
(System)Verilog allows to declare the port direction separate from the
signal declaration. E.g.
```
output x;
integer x;
```
But this is only allowed if the port declaration
* does not have an explicit net type
* does not have an explicit data type
* is a non-ANSI style declaration
For all other cases of port declarations the signal is considered fully
defined and it is not allowed to have a separate signal declaration.
In addition the declared packed dimensions need to match between the port
and signal declaration.
In the current implementation there are a few cases where this is not
handled correctly.
1) It is possible to declare non-ANSI task ports with the same name over
and over again, if it was declared as a signal before the port.
```
task t;
string x;
input logic x;
output real x;
endtask
```
2) It is possible to re-declare non-ANSI input ports of a module that have
a data type, but no explicit net type.
```
module M;
input integer x;
wire integer x;
endmodule
```
3) It is possible to re-declare a ANSI port if it has an implicit data type.
```
module M(output [1:0] x);
reg [1:0] x;
endmodule
```
4) It is possible to declare a vector signal for a scalar non-ANSI task
port.
```
task t;
input x;
reg [7:0] x;
```
To handle all of these correctly refactor signal declaration and lookup a
bit.
The PWire class that represents a signal already has two flags `port_set_`
and `net_set_`. These flags indicate whether a signal has already been used
in a port or signal declaration. A port declaration that includes an
explicit data type is considered both a port and signal declaration.
Use these flags to decide whether it is possible to extend an existing
declaration. E.g. when creating a port without an explicit data type and a
PWire by that name already exists and the `port_set_` flag is not set
extend the existing PWire. On the other hand if the `port_set_` flag is
already set report an error.
Similar for signals but with the `net_set_` flag.
For port declarations with an explicit data type or ANSI style port
declarations it is always an error if a PWire by that name already exists.
This is for both module and task/function ports.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
There are some tests that use non-ANSI style task port declarations where
the port direction has no packed range specification, but the corresponding
signal declaration has as range specification.
This is not valid, the standard requires the range specification for both
to match.
These tests are currently passing because this error is not detected if the
port direction declaration is scalar.
In preparation for eventually detecting this error set the
`no-io-range-error` flag for these tests. When this flag is set the error
is downgraded to a warning.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The br_ml20150606 regression test uses ANSI style port declarations, but
also re-declares the ports inside module as signals.
This is not valid (System)Verilog, even though the data type in the port
declaration is an implicit type. An ANSI-style port is always fully
defined. This defined section 23.2.2.2 ("ANSI style list of port
declarations") of the SystemVerilog LRM (1800-2017) and section 12.3.4
("List of ports declarations") of the Verilog LRM (1364-2005).
The test was originally added in response to a similarly non-compliant test
in the Yosys test suite, but that test has subsequently been updated to
conform to the standard[2].
Remove the non-compliant test in preparation for adding strict standard
compliance checking on ANSI port redeclarations.
[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/iverilog/mailman/message/34182256/
[2] https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys/issues/1570
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that default values are support for module port lists.
* For output ports it is supported in both Verilog and SystemVerilog.
* For input ports it is only supported in SystemVerilog.
* For inout ports it is never supported
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that SystemVerilog sign cast are supported correctly. The regression
tests are modeled after the existing tests for $unsigned/$signed.
They check that
* Width extension is done correctly on the cast expression
* Expressions in the sign cast are evaluated as self-determined
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that the var keyword is supported in the following contexts
* Module ports (both ANSI and non-ANSI)
* Module variable declarations
* Package variable declarations
* Task and function ports
* block variable declarations
* for loop variable declarations
Also check that it is an error to use the var keyword in a for loop without
an explicit data type, as that is not allowed by the standard.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Add regression tests for the following types partial writes for both
2-state and 4-state vectors.
* Non-blocking
* Blocking
* Blocking event control
Check that all in-bounds partial writes, partial out-of-bounds and
full out-of-bounds all works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that multiple events can be used in a non-blocking event control
assignment. The assignment should happen if either of the events trigger.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that a non-blocking event control assignment works as expected to a
lvalue concatenation. All values that are part of the concatenation should
only be assigned after the event triggers.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that non-blocking event control assignments works on an array part
select if the part select index is not an immediate value.
This is a copy of the nb_ec_array_pv test, but using variable indices
instead of immediate values.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that assignment operators on real array entries are supported.
Also check that
* out-of-bounds indices work as expected
* it works after a comparison that set vvp flag 4 to 0
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that the signedness of a struct member is properly handled when being
passed to a system function.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that an assignment operator on an out-of-bounds array element works
as expected. The out-of-bounds access should leave the array unmodified,
but the right-hand side must be evaluated regardless.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Parameters with real values are possible in Verilog, but not in the VCD
format, so lie a little and call them "real" objects. Otherwise, we can
treat them like constants and it works out, at least for gtkwave.
Check that for the following operations the load or store is not skipped
after a operation that sets vvp flag 4.
* Assignment to immediate indexed real array entry
* Assignment operator on immediate indexed vector array entry
* Assignment operator on dynamic vector part select
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Writing parameters into VCD files makes the values available to waveform
tools. This can be done easily enough by writing out a $dumpadd section
at the beginning of the file that sets the parameter values. We don't need
to track the values over change, because by definition they do not change.
This changes the typical vcd output as well, so a few of the regression tests
need to be adjusted to account for this.
Also, while tracking this down, found and fixed the vvp/README.txt documention
for the .param/x records.
Check that out-of-bounds access on a dynamic array or queue works and
returns the correct value.
* 2-state vectors: '0 with the element width
* 4-state vectors: 'x with the element width
* reals: 0.0
* strings: ""
Note that the 2-state test currently still fails as out-of-bounds access on
a 2-state vector incorrectly returns 'x.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that scalar typed parameters are handled correctly. Make sure the
width of the parameter only depends on the type and not on the value
assigned to the parameter.
Same for parameters with a 1-bit range specification.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Check that using a class new operator on a variable that is not of a class
type results in an error.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Stephen Williams
Lars-Peter Clausen
Martin Whitaker