Enhance the lists of identifiers and declaration assignments generated
by the parser to associate each identifier with its lexical_pos. Also do
this for single items in complex parser rules where the location passed
to the pform is not the location of the identifier.
In addition to providing positional arguments for task and functions
SystemVerilog allows to bind arguments by name. This is similar to how
module ports can be bound by name.
```
task t(int a, int b); ... endtask
...
t(.b(1), .a(2));
```
Extend the parser and elaboration stage to be able to handle this. During
elaboration the named argument list is transformed into a purely positional
list so that later stages like synthesis do not have to care about the
names.
For system functions and tasks all arguments must be unnamed, otherwise an
error will be reported.
In addition to functions and tasks arguments can also be bound by name for
the various different ways of invoking a class constructor.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
There are a few places where some sort of expression list is printed. Add
helper functions to consolidate this in a single place and reduce the
amount of code.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In SystemVerilog identifiers can usually have an additional package scope
in which they should be resolved. At the moment there are many places in
the code base that handle the resolution of the package scope.
Add a common data type for package scoped paths as well as a
symbol_search() variant that works on package scoped identifiers. This
allows to handle package scope resolution in a central place.
Having the code in a central place makes it easier to ensure consistent and
correct behavior. E.g. there are currently some corner case bugs that are
common to all implementations. With the common implementation it only has
to be fixed in one place.
It will also make it easier to eventually implement class scoped
identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This includes support at the parser (pform) through enaboration
and the netlist format for the break and continue statements.
Elaboration actually already worked for for-loops, but since the code
generators need more information, this is a rewire of that support to
be explicit about for-loops. This means they are not rewritten as fancy
while loops. The code generators will have to handle that.
Given the elaboration of for-loops now work, write the vvp code generator
support needed to implement it.
Now that for-loops are presented as for-loops to the code generator, the
vlog95 code generator doesn't need to infer them anymore. Generate the code
more directly.
Also update the tests list so that the vlog95_reg tests all pass.
Internally the special THIS_TOKEN("@") and SUPER_TOKEN("#") are used
to represent the special `this` and `super` keywords in a component
name.
When printing an identifier replace the tokens with their keywords.
This generates nicer error and debug messages.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The ivl_variable_type_t in PWire is now only used for passing the base type
for vector types to the elaboration stage. But we can query the base the
from the vector_type_t itself. If the there is no data_type_t set for the
PWire the base type will default to IVL_VT_LOGIC.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For loops may have empty initialization statements. In that case some things
can't be done, such as loop unrolling or synthesis, but otherwise it is a
valid thing to do. So generate the correct code in this case.
Currently typedefs are just a pointer to a data_type_t.
Currently typedefs are implemented by setting the name field of a
data_type_t when a typedef of the type is declared. This works mostly, but
there are some corner cases that can't be supported.
E.g. a typedef of a typedef does not work as it overwrites the name field
of the same data_type_t multiple times.
Forward typedefs can also not be supported since forward typedefs allow to
reference a type before it has been declared.
There are also some problems with type identifier references from a
higher-level scope if there is a type identifier in the current scope with
the same name, but it is declared after the type identifier has been
referenced. E.g. in the following x should be a vector fo width 8, but it
will be a vector of width 4, because while the right type is used it is
elaborated in the wrong scope.
```
localparam A = 8;
typedef logic [A-1:0] T;
module M;
localparam A = 4;
T x;
typedef int T;
endmodule
```
Furthermore typedefs used for the type of ports are elaborated in the wrong
scope.
To handle these corner case issues introduce a data_type_t for typedefs.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Currently when referencing a typedef this gets replaced with the
`data_type_t` that the typedef points to. This works for most cases, but
there are some corner cases where it breaks down.
E.g. it is possible to have a scoped type identifier which references a
type defined in a package. For such type identifiers, only the data_type_t
itself is remembered, but not the package scope. This will cause the type
identifier to be elaborated in the wrong scope.
Furthermore type identifiers of vector types used for module or task port
might not be elaborated in the correct scope.
Introduce a new `typeref_t` which has `data_type_t` as a base type and can
be used as the data type for a signal. A new instance of a `typeref_t` is
created when referencing a type identifier. The `typeref_t` remembers both
the data type and the scope of the type identifier.
When elaborating the `typeref_t` the elaboration is passed through to the
referenced `data_type_t`. But special care is taken to lookup the right
scope first.
With the new approach also typedefs of typedefs are supported. This
previously did not work because chained typedefs all reference the same
`data_type_t`, but each typedef sets the `name` field of the `data_type_t`.
So the second typedef overwrites the first typedef and a lookup of the
scope of the first typedef by name will fail as it will return the scope of
the second typedef.
This refactoring also allows to define clear ownership of a data_type_t
instance. This e.g. means that an array type owns its base type and the
base type can be freed when the array type itself is freed. The same is
true for signals and class properties, they now own their data type and the
data type can be freed when the signal or property is freed.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
SystemVerilog supports sign cast where it is possible to change the
signedness of an expression. Syntactical it is similar to width or type
casting, except that the keywords 'signed' or 'unsigned' are used in front
of the cast operator. E.g.
```
logic [3:0] a = 4'b1000;
logic [7:0] b = signed'(a); // b is 8'b11111000;
logic signed [3:0] c = 4'b1000;
logic signed [7:0] d = unsigned'(c); // d is 8'b00001000;
```
As noted by the LRM section 6.24.1 ("Cast operator") applying a sign cast
to an expression is equivalent to calling the $signed() and $unsigned()
system functions on the expression.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The custom `svector` class is essentially a subset of `std::vector`. There
is no inherent advantage to using `svector`. Both have the same memory
footprint.
`svector` was designed to be of static size, but there are a few places in
the parser where it has to grow at runtime. Handling this becomes a bit
easier by switching to `std::vector` since it is possible to use its
methods which take care of resizing the vector.
This also allows to remove the unused parameter of the `lgate` struct
constructor, which was only needed for compatibility with `svector`.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When using non-ANSI style port declarations it is possible to declare the
port direction and the data type for the port in separate statements. E.g.
```
input x;
reg x;
```
When using packed array dimensions they must match for both declarations.
E.g.
```
input [3:0] x;
reg [3:0] x;
```
But this only applies for vector types, i.e. the packed dimension is
explicitly declared. It does not apply to the `integer` and `time` types,
which have an implicit packed dimension.
The current implementation requires that even for `integer` and `time`
types the implicit dimension needs to be explicitly declared in the port
direction. E.g. the following will result in a elaboration error
complaining about a packed dimension mismatch.
```
module test;
output x;
integer x;
endmodule
```
Currently the parser creates a vector_type_t for `time` and `integer`. This
means that e.g. `time` and `reg [63:0]` are indistinguishable during
elaboration, even though they require different behavior.
To fix let the atom2_type_t handle `integer` and `time`. Since it no longer
exclusively handles 2-state types, rename it to atom_type_t.
This also fixes a problem with the vlog95 target unit tests. The vlog95
target translates
```
module test(output integer x);
endmodule
```
to
```
module test(x);
output x;
integer x;
endmodule
```
which then fails when being elaborated again. There were some regression
tests that were failing because of this that will now pass.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The logic that decides whether a vector is scalar or not incorrectly flags
all variables that are declared in packages as scalar. As a result it is
not possible to do a part select on a vector declared in a package.
Rather than having an independent scalar flag consider a vector as scalar
if it does not have any packed dimensions.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
SystemVerilog allows to omit the default value of a parameter declared in a
parameter port list. In this case the parameter must be overridden for
every module instance. This is defined in section 6.20.1 ("Parameter
declaration syntax") of the LRM (1800-2017).
In addition a module that has a parameter without a default value does not
qualify for automatic toplevel module selection.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
During parsing parameters and localparams are kept in a separate list only
to be collected into the same list during elaboration.
Store them in the same list during parsing as well, this allows to remove
some duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
enums for a scope are stored in a std::set. This means when iterating over
the enums during elaboration it is possible that they are elaborated in a
different order than they have been declared in. This causes problems if
one enum references items of the other enum. E.g.
```
enum {
A
} a;
enum {
B = A
} b;
```
In the current implementation whether this works or not depends on the
pointer values of the enum_type_t for `a` and `b`, which can change between
environments.
To make sure that enums are elaborated in the same order use a std::vector
instead of a std::set.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the common data_type_or_implicit rules to support type
definitions for parameters. This eliminates a bunch of special
rules in parse.y, and opens the door for parameters having
more complex types.
When strings are arguments to functions/tasks, that doesn't suddenly
make them implicitly scalar. Strings are vectors and should be treated
that was, even if they are IMPLICIT_REG.
The unique, unique0, and priority keywords can decorate case statements
to tell the run time (or synthesis) to do extra tests (or make extra
assumptions). These tests are not implemented in the vvp run time, but
now the decorations make it to the code generators.
(* my_fancy_attribute *)
foobar1 foobar (clk(clk), rst(rst) ...);
- Modifies PGModule to hold the attribute map (can be verified with pform_dump)
- pform_make_modgate(s) bind the attributes from the parser to the above map
- The attributes from PGModule are inserted into the NetScope of that module
PGModule::elaborate_scope_mod_instances_
- Currently these attributes automatically make it into netlist
- These attributes are accessible via ivl_scope_attr_cnt and ivl_scope_attr_val
from ivl_target.h